well, the global warming alarmists just ignore the basic science. atmospheric carbon follows temperature and not the other way around. whatever the sun does and the particle flow from space onto earth is much more important to earths climate than worshipping climate models disconnected from actual climate data. humans try hard but they'll not be able to change the tide much, when it comes to the next ice age that has already started. just how cold will it get this time compared to 12000 years ago, the last time climate change seriously challenged human progress? of course humanity will survive whatever hits, but are we aware of when, how and by what degree the change will challenge us? most are not even asking the important questions and let themselves distract by political shell games of those in power trying to secure their way to the sunny side of life with the least amount of personal sacrifice possible.
We love Fig. 6. We'd call the blue line the "Command & Control" line and the Orange line the "Free Market" line. We note that the Orange line was achieved with little taxpayer subsidies, and the Blue line was achieved at enormous cost to taxpayers in the form of subsidies.
Some might say the Orange line was achieved because capital, free markets and innovation saw the "war on coal" and understood the physics and economics of "renewables".
This has been obvious to me for several decades. I can't believe it's not equally apparent to our rulers as well. Thus I've come to believe that they don't want us to get out.
well, the global warming alarmists just ignore the basic science. atmospheric carbon follows temperature and not the other way around. whatever the sun does and the particle flow from space onto earth is much more important to earths climate than worshipping climate models disconnected from actual climate data. humans try hard but they'll not be able to change the tide much, when it comes to the next ice age that has already started. just how cold will it get this time compared to 12000 years ago, the last time climate change seriously challenged human progress? of course humanity will survive whatever hits, but are we aware of when, how and by what degree the change will challenge us? most are not even asking the important questions and let themselves distract by political shell games of those in power trying to secure their way to the sunny side of life with the least amount of personal sacrifice possible.
Ten years from now people won't be saying nuclear is 10 years too late anymore, I bet
Jack, please contact me at: retsubmariner@hotmail.com.
I think we may have some mutual benefits.
Ed
Great follow up article. The following line is one of the best I've read in years (congrats on that).....
"Progress only happens when things get cheaper. And when things get cheaper, it happens automatically. No international agreements are required."
Can i use that line above?
Of course.
Superb, Jack.
We love Fig. 6. We'd call the blue line the "Command & Control" line and the Orange line the "Free Market" line. We note that the Orange line was achieved with little taxpayer subsidies, and the Blue line was achieved at enormous cost to taxpayers in the form of subsidies.
Some might say the Orange line was achieved because capital, free markets and innovation saw the "war on coal" and understood the physics and economics of "renewables".
"This source is our only out."
This has been obvious to me for several decades. I can't believe it's not equally apparent to our rulers as well. Thus I've come to believe that they don't want us to get out.