Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David MacQuigg's avatar

OK, you have convinced me that use of WIPP for NPP waste is not just a convenient use of an already existing facility, but a boost to the anti-nuclear position that the danger of NPP waste is extreme. This is relevant to our discussion on Waste Management in Citizendium. I will add a link to your article. We already have your earlier response on our Debate Guide page:

// Response from Jack Devanney, Principal Engineer, ThorCon USA Inc, and author of Why Nuclear Power Has Been A Flop email 14 July 2023:

"Deep Geologic Disposal is an order of magnitude more expensive than dry cask. It is both unnecessary and stupid. It is stupid because you are throwing away already refined U-238, which we will need for breeders. It is stupid because it sends a clear message that spent fuel is uniquely dangerous. In fact, after the [penetrating radiation] is gone, spent fuel is just another poison, and not a particularly dangerous one."

//

Expand full comment
A.C.'s avatar

A far cheaper plan would be to solution-mine a small salt cavern, then add cement to the TRU waste and pump the grout down. Then seal the rest of the cavern and borehole with more (clean) grout. The should-cost would be under 10 million, and no need for ventilation systems or flammable kitty-litter.

Of course this idea would never be used, as it is too cheap for modern merchants of despair.

Expand full comment
28 more comments...

No posts